If there is one thing that irritates me more than any other, it has to
be historical inaccuracies in film and TV scripts.
Now I’m not talking about things like Braveheart or The Battle of the
Bulge or countless other attempts’ by the Americans to rewrite history.
No, the things that irritate me are the little things, the small easy to
verify things, the things that they just can’t be bothered to do right.
For example, there was an American sci-fi series in the 90’s called
“Babylon 5” which I much enjoyed, and if truth be told I liked it more than the
Star Trek equivalent of “Deep Space 9”.
However, in one episode, “Comes The Inquisitor”, there was a character
called Sebastian, who it transpired as the story unfolded was in reality Jack
the Ripper.
When his true identity came to light during the story it was announced
that in the late 1800’s Jack the Ripper plagued London’s West End.
No! No! No! Jack the Ripper did not stalk the theatre district he was
too busy amusing himself killing prostitutes in the East End.
It was a simple mistake that just shouldn’t have happened, but it did
and there really is no excuse for it this day and age when research is such a
simple matter.
I find it difficult to comprehend that such a basic error made it to the
airing.
Surely one of the writing team or production staff or even one of the
cast would have asked “Are you sure it was the West End?” but apparently not.
Last Christmas my wife bought me the boxed set and when we were watching
the relevant episode, we both braced ourselves for the fateful moment and then
laughed when we discovered it had been rather amateurishly dubbed.
No comments:
Post a Comment